Today’s post has a little back story. I hope you’ll indulge me.
Several weeks ago I received a comment here at HR Bartender. It was a long, frustrating remark about applicant tracking systems (ATS) and how these online systems are preventing applicants from a fair chance to get a job.
After reading the remark, I thought it would be a good idea to share with readers why companies use applicant tracking systems. That way if you’re looking for a job, or know someone who is, you’ll understand what human resources is doing with the information you’re sending them. So I reached out to recruiting pro Jessica Miller-Merrell at Workology and asked if she would collaborate with me on this post.
Meanwhile, I discovered that Laurie Ruettimann, author of The Cynical Girl, received the exact same comment. And that embedded in the comment was spam. You can read Laurie’s full comment here.
Of course, I’m completely embarrassed that I asked Jessica to help me write a post based on a spammy comment. Jessica was very gracious about the whole thing. And in laughing about my faux pas, we realized that there are probably plenty of job applicants who are frustrated with applying for jobs online. They feel their resume is shipped off to some sort of black hole never to be heard from again. And that HR pros are being labeled lazy for not responding to online applications.
So we decided to proceed with our original plan and share with you the inside scoop on applicant tracking systems and their role in the recruitment process. I hope you find it valuable.
Lots of companies have transitioned to having people apply for positions online. Why do companies accept online applications (versus walk-in applicants)?
(Jessica) Accepting applications online helps HR to organize and sort through the application process. Online allows for keyword search, data storage, and aids in compliance for companies who have government contracts and those that have hiring managers and employees who manage and hire teams in different places.
We’ve both heard the downside of applying online is applicants feel the process lacks the human touch which can in turn comes across as “Lazy HR.” Is there a plus for candidates to apply online (that might make up for the lack of human interaction upfront)?
(Jessica) The application process is built to store and sort resume databases. Sometimes HR is lazy but most often HR is responsible for so much within the organization, they are working to balance hiring, firing, training, advisement, and employee investigations in addition to the recruiting process. Companies are flooded with calls and emails by employees who are checking in on their application. Applying online ensures that your resume is stored and searchable within the database. It’s important to aid in making your resume and application more searchable by including key words increasing the chances that the hiring manager will review your resume.
It certainly helps to have a personal connection at an organization. This is where personal relationships can come into play to aid or elevate your application. Having a personal relationship or referral inside the company whether it’s a business contact, family member, or someone you’ve recently connected online, can make a difference.
If I’m an applicant and I apply online, why are keywords and phrases important? And aren’t keywords and phrases important even if I’m not applying online?
(Jessica) Recruiters and hiring managers search by keyword to review resumes. It’s important to understand that companies are bombarded by candidates applying online with only a small percentage of them actually being qualified for the position. Unfortunately this takes time and having to sort through a candidate pool for 25 different open positions for recruiters is time consuming, sometimes overwhelming, and a long process.
One trend I’m noticing is that job requirements are changing because the business world is changing. For example, say I was a project engineer 5 years ago and the required skill set was ABC. Today’s project engineer still needs ABC plus they need XYZ. You’re out talking with people every day. Are you seeing the same thing? And if so, what advice would you give to applicants about keeping up their skills?
(Jessica) The average person stays in a single position for 18 months. It’s always important to take a realistic approach when reviewing your skills and qualifications. The economy has changed the hiring process. Companies are expecting their hiring managers to do more with less, and that means that you will need to have more skills to be among those in final consideration.
Understand and know that your peers and friends within your industry are your competition. It’s important to develop a strategy for continued learning and development keeping your competition in mind working towards a mix of essential skills and skills that will differentiate you from your friends. This means asking questions, creating a personal development strategy, and researching the current job openings to look for new skills and qualifications that other companies are looking for. You can better prepare for your exit or to a new position evaluating the trends you see while also working with an experienced mentor to help guide you in the right direction.
Last question. Let’s talk about hiring managers. In your experience, what do hiring managers want from HR in the recruitment process?
(Jessica) Hiring managers want HR to get it right and send them the best qualified candidates for the position. The problem is that HR doesn’t often understand what the hiring manager wants or needs. They haven’t walked a mile in their shoes or even truly understand the industry or the organization. Sometimes that is due to the process and sometimes the hiring manager doesn’t really understand. It’s important for HR to ask lots of questions not only to the hiring manager but employees who currently hold the same position that you are hiring for. I’ve had success taking a more consultant approach to recruiting using a checklist, a position review form to get as complete information about the position as possible.
Hiring managers don’t always want to hear this or take the time in which to do it, but the time upfront spent makes the recruiting process more enjoyable and the process quicker and more efficient.
My thanks to Jessica for sharing her expertise. If you would like gain more insight into recruitment strategy, check out Jessica’s blog or follow her on Twitter.
7
david k waltz says
I don’t even apply online because it is a total waste of time. Either there is a human route in or that company is SOL.
In my case I know one of the things that trip me up. Where it says “bachelors in finance, MBA preferred”, the search is set up to accept those with the bachelors, irrespective of the MBA held.
Breanne Harris says
Excellent post! As a former recruiter, I understand all of the benefits of an ATS. They aren’t made to screen people out, they’re designed to make the process easier on everyone…..except when it doesn’t. This topic is actually fresh in my mind because two days ago I sat next to my husband as he applied for a job online with Best Buy. Just for fun, go on and apply for any retail job yourself. Count how many clicks it takes you to get through the process (hint: it takes more than the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie pop….seriously). Additionally, there is no place to upload your resume, which means you have to manually enter all employment information. Okay, fine…time consuming, but no biggie, right? Yes, except that in the space where applicants are supposed to enter their previous role/responsibilities for a job they’re given less space than the number of characters in a tweet. I’m not joking here. I didn’t count, but I’d guess there were about 100 characters of space. Imagine describing your skills/job experiences in the space of a single tweet (and remember that you aren’t allowed to upload your resume….so this is ALL they’re getting from you). Yikes, right? I was floored by how horrible the system was. I’d love to see a screen-by-screen commentary in a blog post by one of you awesome HR bloggers. It would be highly entertaining.
Francois Guay (@GuayFrancois) says
The problem is not the ATS nor the on-line process, it’s the people that designed the on-line process.
HR it’s all about the candidate process, get back to people, automate it at the very least to let people know you received their resume or that they dont’ cut it. Technology is amazing so use it but dont forget that hiring great people is actually about connecting with them in the first place!!!
Do you know that 50% of candidates that had a bad recruiting experience at a company will not shop there… I don’t blame them any company that does not provide a quick and effective application process should be boycotted.
David Smooke (@DavidSmooke) says
Great Advice Jessica in identifying,”The problem is that HR doesn’t often understand what the hiring manager wants or needs.” This is why all recruiting software should be collaborative, mimicking a Facebook wall to consolidate feedback from all team members to ensure that new hire is best for all who will work together. Use Technology to Get on the Same Page.
@Breanne “it takes more than the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a tootsie pop….seriously” How unfortunately true in applying to far too many positions! We have the technology to permanently store our professional information (i.e. Facebook, LinkedIn), and apply with one click. Lets Use It.
If you want Enterprise Quality recruiting software – that’s Free forever – Check Out SmartRecruiters!
http://www.smartrecruiters.com/
Tony Nicholls says
Excellent post Sharlyn. Laurie’s blog is also excellent, so it’s an inspired partnership for you two to work together.
On the subject of ATS, I can see the logic for their use, but like your other commentators, feel it is in their design and implementation that they often fail.
By all means filter out the obvious non-starters but first give applicants a very clear, definitive list of essential qualifications, skills and experiences needed. Advertisements should include the exact phrases that will be searched. This gives the applicant the chance to include these phrases in their application. If you search for something that is not asked for in the advertisement then surely you are missing great candidates who might use alternative phrases that mean the same thing? Beyond the initial filter, then of course, the process has to become more personal.
On the subject of lazy HR, I agree that there are good and bad HR departments but the real issue for me is lazy management. I’ve delivered in both operational and HR leadership roles and in both cases have always taken a very, very keen interest when recruiting for my teams. I never leave it to HR to do the job for me. I partner with them, use their resources but never assume they know what I’m looking for.
In fact, in many cases, I have already found candidates through my and my team’s networks before HR have had chance to start their searching. If more managers took more responsibility for finding their own people, maybe there wouldn’t be the need for ATS?
Sharlyn Lauby says
@David – Thanks for the comment. There are definite advantages to building relationships within companies. You’ve hit on one of them.
@Breanne – I can only imagine! You bring up a very valid point about HR pros checking out their online process. Thanks for the comment.
@Francois – Excellent comment about the connection between the applicant and consumer experience. I’ve always worked places where the applicant could also be a customer. It was a priority to make sure candidates who were not selected felt good about the brand.
@David – Thanks for sharing!
@Tony – Thanks for the comment. Totally agree, technology can only take you so far. The recruiting process must go personal.