<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking Both/And</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/</link>
	<description>HR RESPONSIBLY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9334</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hr bartender</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2924</link>
		<dc:creator>hr bartender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2924</guid>
		<description>Thanks Saleem for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Saleem for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saleem</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator>Saleem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2920</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree that companies need to shift their thinking about technology.  Thanks for sharing this informative article..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree that companies need to shift their thinking about technology.  Thanks for sharing this informative article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean logic &#8211; going beyond binary &#171; Don&#39;t Compromise!</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2702</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean logic &#8211; going beyond binary &#171; Don&#39;t Compromise!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2702</guid>
		<description>[...]  In a recent Crackers article, we provided a link to an excellent piece at the HR Bartender blog, Thinking Both/And, or – to give it it’s fuller and less ambiguous title – “Moving beyond [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  In a recent Crackers article, we provided a link to an excellent piece at the HR Bartender blog, Thinking Both/And, or – to give it it’s fuller and less ambiguous title – “Moving beyond [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Work Fun &#124; HRM Today</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Work Fun &#124; HRM Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>[...] you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on HR topics.Yesterday, I wrote a post about hearing Luis Von Ahn Ph.D. and his thoughts on human computation.  Besides talking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on HR topics.Yesterday, I wrote a post about hearing Luis Von Ahn Ph.D. and his thoughts on human computation.  Besides talking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hr bartender</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>hr bartender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right.  We can use the &#039;both/and&#039; mentality for many of our challenges.  It&#039;s a great tool for understanding and solving problems.  Thanks for commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right.  We can use the &#8216;both/and&#8217; mentality for many of our challenges.  It&#8217;s a great tool for understanding and solving problems.  Thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Crackers (15) &#171; Don&#39;t Compromise!</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Crackers (15) &#171; Don&#39;t Compromise!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>[...] Thinking Both/And: we’ve highlighted her contributions in ‘Crackers’ before, but Sharlyn Lauby’s recent post at The Hr Bartender is truly a cracker. Constructive, positive and challenging – and the concept of ‘Both/And’ is one that deserves greater consideration in many, many aspects of working life. Sharlyn, we will putting pen to paper shortly, and thank you for the inspiration. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thinking Both/And: we’ve highlighted her contributions in ‘Crackers’ before, but Sharlyn Lauby’s recent post at The Hr Bartender is truly a cracker. Constructive, positive and challenging – and the concept of ‘Both/And’ is one that deserves greater consideration in many, many aspects of working life. Sharlyn, we will putting pen to paper shortly, and thank you for the inspiration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dont compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2010/strategic/thinking-bothand/comment-page-1/#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>dont compromise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=3088#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>As ever, a great post. Just finished reading Richard Donkin&#039;s &quot;The Future of Work&quot; (will publish our review shortly), with simmers with frsutration at the barriers - mostly mental or a lack of willpower - to chaning how we look at and think about work. It strikes me the whole concept of &quot;moving from a ‘either/or’ to a ‘both/and’&quot; has applications beyond just our relationship with technology: it&#039;s not a panacea to the ills of bad practice, but it could be a very useful tool in helping us to think through ways of constructively challenging them. Thanks for a very inspiring piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever, a great post. Just finished reading Richard Donkin&#8217;s &#8220;The Future of Work&#8221; (will publish our review shortly), with simmers with frsutration at the barriers &#8211; mostly mental or a lack of willpower &#8211; to chaning how we look at and think about work. It strikes me the whole concept of &#8220;moving from a ‘either/or’ to a ‘both/and’&#8221; has applications beyond just our relationship with technology: it&#8217;s not a panacea to the ills of bad practice, but it could be a very useful tool in helping us to think through ways of constructively challenging them. Thanks for a very inspiring piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
