<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ready-Fire-Aim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/</link>
	<description>HR RESPONSIBLY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Insert blog topic here. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Insert blog topic here. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=2308#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>[...] asking for your help. In the spirit of my last blog experiment (which drew some interesting responses), I&#8217;d like to propose another venture in blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asking for your help. In the spirit of my last blog experiment (which drew some interesting responses), I&#8217;d like to propose another venture in blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ML Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>ML Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=2308#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>Great post! I think that it takes true and genuine leadership to take a close look at your business strategies and make sure they work for your employees and customers. Both need to be appreciated! The questions you mentioned should be in the forefront of your mind and not in the back. Being able to know the answers will keep your company sharp!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I think that it takes true and genuine leadership to take a close look at your business strategies and make sure they work for your employees and customers. Both need to be appreciated! The questions you mentioned should be in the forefront of your mind and not in the back. Being able to know the answers will keep your company sharp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Bock</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=2308#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ready-Fire-Aim&quot; (RFA) was a Tom Peters line from In Search of Excellence. It was coined as a counter to the &quot;Paralysis by Analysis&quot; school of management. Peters advocates live trials early in most development processes and urges &quot;a bias toward action.&quot; In that usage, RFA is still good advice. 

But you&#039;ve zeroed in on another issue. The tendency to let the urgent drive the important out the door, into the parking lot, and over the hill. It&#039;s something of a management plague these days. You highlight good examples. 

There&#039;s another one that I&#039;ve encountered in working with supervisors. It&#039;s applying RFA to documentation. Spot something wrong, reach for the word process and start to document. But as I&#039;ve stressed in the Working Supervisor&#039;s Support Kit and elsewhere, that&#039;s usually not effective. 

It&#039;s usually better to let your team member know what you&#039;ve noticed and that you will be watching for similar behavior and documenting it. I&#039;ve found that most of the time, for most team members, that&#039;s all that&#039;s needed to achieve correction without the need for either paperwork or a team member feeling blindsided. As one of my class participants observed, &quot;Most good supervision happens in the cracks in the system.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ready-Fire-Aim&#8221; (RFA) was a Tom Peters line from In Search of Excellence. It was coined as a counter to the &#8220;Paralysis by Analysis&#8221; school of management. Peters advocates live trials early in most development processes and urges &#8220;a bias toward action.&#8221; In that usage, RFA is still good advice. </p>
<p>But you&#8217;ve zeroed in on another issue. The tendency to let the urgent drive the important out the door, into the parking lot, and over the hill. It&#8217;s something of a management plague these days. You highlight good examples. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s another one that I&#8217;ve encountered in working with supervisors. It&#8217;s applying RFA to documentation. Spot something wrong, reach for the word process and start to document. But as I&#8217;ve stressed in the Working Supervisor&#8217;s Support Kit and elsewhere, that&#8217;s usually not effective. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s usually better to let your team member know what you&#8217;ve noticed and that you will be watching for similar behavior and documenting it. I&#8217;ve found that most of the time, for most team members, that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s needed to achieve correction without the need for either paperwork or a team member feeling blindsided. As one of my class participants observed, &#8220;Most good supervision happens in the cracks in the system.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.hrbartender.com/2009/strategic/ready-fire-aim/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrbartender.com/?p=2308#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts, Sharlyn. I&#039;ve seen the endless-fire-drill style of management in action, and you&#039;re right -- it stinks.

Good management, best I can tell, addresses both momentary outcomes (the smoke/fire) and durable processes (the fireproofing).

Both, always, at the same time.

But that&#039;s hard. Which is why we see mediocre-to-bad managers and management teams *talk* about process while actually reacting (more or less badly) to momentary outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts, Sharlyn. I&#8217;ve seen the endless-fire-drill style of management in action, and you&#8217;re right &#8212; it stinks.</p>
<p>Good management, best I can tell, addresses both momentary outcomes (the smoke/fire) and durable processes (the fireproofing).</p>
<p>Both, always, at the same time.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s hard. Which is why we see mediocre-to-bad managers and management teams *talk* about process while actually reacting (more or less badly) to momentary outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.hrbartender.com @ 2012-02-08 16:11:44 -->
